business
Inside the NOC Nepal Crisis: When Bribes Beat Honesty
by Khatapana
Jun 23, 2025 - 11 min read

From canteens to consultancies, here’s how the NOC online process in Nepal was hijacked; exposing corruption, fake papers, and broken trust in the NOC office.
If you’ve ever visited the NOC office in Sanothimi, you’ll know this. The line moves slow, the tension’s high, and students clutch folders like lifelines.
Somewhere in that crowd, a voice leans in.
“Don’t wait in line. Go to the canteen and they’ll get your NOC sorted by today.”
Wait, what? The canteen?
That’s exactly what one student did. He walked into the nearby tea stall, not expecting anything more than a cup of milk tea. Instead, he found someone casually discussing NOC prices, not the official kind, but the black-market kind. A few weeks later, a leaked video landed at the Ministry of Education. In it, a stationery shop near the NOC office was caught bargaining over an NOC application. The price? Rs. 10,000. Then, it dropped to Rs. 5,000, just like that.
This wasn’t a one-off. This was the routine.
And if you’ve ever applied for your NOC online, you might’ve heard whispers of this system too; the shortcuts, the fixers, the canteens that somehow knew more than the government counters inside.
What followed wasn’t just a few shady shortcuts. It was an entire underground market; fake documents, digital backdoors, canteen fixers, consultancy middlemen, and a chain of approvals greased with QR codes instead of cash. And all of it operated right under the government’s nose, inside a system that's not just broken, but legally wide open to charges of bribery, forgery, and institutional failure.
This is the story of how NOC Nepal quietly turned into a gateway. Not just to foreign universities, but to one of the most organized, overlooked, and prosecutable scams in the country.
What Exactly is an NOC, and Why is It Such a Big Deal?
Let’s pause for a second and ask the obvious: What even is an NOC?
NOC stands for No Objection Certificate. In Nepal, if you’re planning to study abroad, you’ll need this certificate from the Ministry of Education. It’s basically a letter from the government saying:
“We don’t object to this student going overseas for higher education.”
Simple, right?
But here’s the twist: without this certificate, you can’t process your student visa, you can’t transfer fees from Nepali banks, and in some countries, you might not even get enrolled. That’s why the NOC Nepal system holds so much power over students’ dreams.
Check out the full process of how you can get your hands on it!
In theory, you apply for your NOC online, attach your documents (admission letter, offer letter, academic transcripts, etc.), and wait for approval from the NOC office. In practice, though? Things aren’t always that smooth.
Ask around and you’ll hear the same story: students submit everything properly. But weeks pass, and nothing moves. Then someone tells them, “Go through a consultancy. Or better yet, check the canteen.”
And that’s when they realize: the real process doesn’t always follow the official guidelines. In fact, many students end up stuck between doing things the right way, and doing things the fast way.
So who are the culprits behind this ‘fast-tracked’ process?
The Canteen That Knew Too Much
Just outside the gates of the NOC office, there’s a modest canteen; nothing flashy. A few plastic chairs, an old menu board, and the usual smell of milk tea and chowmein.
But if walls could talk, this little eatery would spill some serious secrets.
Because here’s what really happens: students frustrated with the delays inside the NOC Nepal branch quietly step into this canteen. Not to eat, but to ask. To negotiate. To get their NOC online application “fast-tracked” the unofficial way.
“I heard you can help with NOC?”
“Yes, just bring your documents and pay the charge. We’ll handle it.”
That’s what a hidden camera revealed. And ministry officials? They weren’t surprised.
The canteen became a kind of side entrance into the government system. Some students didn’t even walk into the NOC office first. They went straight to the canteen. Phone calls were made. Names were dropped. Documents were “managed.”
One ministry official admitted,
“Sometimes the canteen operator would show up with applications, saying ‘This is my relative's paperwork.’ Other times, they'd already settled the amount with the student and just needed the signature.”
The canteen wasn’t just a café anymore. It had turned into a middleman, a fixer’s office, a shadow branch of the NOC Nepal system.
And it worked for a price.
But if you think the canteen was the only player in this game, think again. Just a few steps away, another unexpected “service provider” was getting in on the action.
Stationery Shops with a Side Hustle
If you’ve ever printed documents near a government office, you know the vibe. There's always a stationery shop nearby; printer buzzing, passport photos on the wall, forms scattered everywhere.
But outside the NOC office, these weren’t just print shops. They were unofficial service centers for paid approvals.
The biggest reveal? A leaked video showing a student casually asking:
“What do I need to do for the NOC?”
“Ten thousand rupees. It’ll be done by today,” says the shopkeeper.
They bargain down to five.
That’s all it took. Five thousand rupees to get a government document that decides whether you can study abroad.
And this wasn’t hidden in some alley. It happened right next to the official counter. The same place where students refresh their NOC online status for weeks with no updates.
At times, the stationery shop was busier than the government desk. Not with printing jobs, but with students who needed more than ink and paper.
In fact, they weren’t just helping. They were fabricating.
Fake offer letters. Edited admission dates. Templated course adjustments to make unqualified programs look “eligible.”
Printed. Stamped. Ready to upload.
They had it down to a science.
So while honest students got stuck over small errors, others walked away with approvals based on documents typed in Microsoft Word, just across the street.
But even these shops weren’t working alone. Behind them stood the real organizers, the consultancies running the entire operation.
How Consultancies Took Over the NOC Pipeline
If the canteen was the whisper network and the stationery shops the fixer’s desk, the real masterminds behind the NOC Nepal corruption scene sat behind polished consultancy tables with clean logos and big promises.
They called themselves career counselors. But for many students trying to get their NOC online, they became something else entirely; facilitators of fast-tracked approvals, even when the paperwork didn’t add up.
How It Usually Starts
Most students try the right way first.
They upload their documents through the NOC online portal. Then they wait. And wait. Nothing moves.
Eventually, someone suggests a consultancy.
The consultancy reviews the case, and promises to “take care of everything.” And they do. Not by navigating red tape, but by rewriting it.
The Real Work Happened Off the Record
Behind the scenes, these consultancies were doing much more than guiding students. They were rewriting their stories.
- Offer letters were edited to meet eligibility.
- Admission letters were updated or entirely fabricated.
- Course details were “tweaked” to make them appear compliant with Nepal’s credit hour requirements.
Even students who were technically ineligible, like those without clearance from the Medical Education Commission, were still getting NOCs issued.
And most of them didn’t even know. They thought they were just paying for expert help.
The Cost of a Shortcut
This wasn’t cheap, but it was fast. Consultancies charged anywhere from Rs. 30,000 to Rs. 1,00,000, depending on how complicated a case looked.
Payments rarely happened in cash. Everything moved digitally, via eSewa, bank transfers, or QR payments. It all felt oddly efficient for something that was deeply illegal.
The official noc online process was still there, of course, but mostly as a formality. Real approvals were happening offline, behind closed doors, fueled by connections and commissions.
A Parallel System, Running Better Than the Real One
Over time, this underground process became more reliable than the real one.
Students who followed the rules often waited for weeks. Those who paid the right people had their noc office stamp in a matter of days.
This wasn’t just corruption. It became the default.
An entire parallel pipeline emerged. Faster, costlier, and quietly tolerated by those meant to regulate it.
And the worst part? People inside the system saw it happening.
Some turned a blind eye. Others walked away.
But most just kept the machine running, because that’s what everyone else was doing.
What Did the Ministry of Education Do About It?
For a while, the scam ran in plain sight, with tea stalls doing paperwork, stationery shops setting prices, and consultancies closing deals. But eventually, the complaints got too loud, and the excuses wore thin.
Students started speaking out, both on social media and inside ministry halls. Their noc online applications were stuck. Delays dragged on. But somehow, consultancies kept getting things done overnight.
That’s when the first alarm reached the top.
The Video That Set It Off
In early 2080, a leaked video reached the Ministry of Education. It showed a student bargaining for an NOC inside a stationery shop, just steps from the official counter. The footage was undeniable. This wasn’t a fluke. It was a routine.
Then-Minister Sumana Shrestha made an unannounced visit to the noc office. Quietly, she had already sent a surveillance team ahead. What they found confirmed the worst; an entire ecosystem of corruption operating right outside government walls.
A Quiet Resignation with a Loud Message
At the time, the branch was led by under-secretary Shantirām Poudel. Not long after that inspection, he resigned.
It looked like a routine transfer. But insiders knew he feared being scapegoated. Fake entries, shared logins, third-party handlers, the whole system felt like a trap. And Poudel, knowing he couldn't control it anymore, chose to walk away.
New Minister, Same Old Problem
After Shrestha, Vidya Bhattarai took over. She too conducted surprise visits. She too heard complaints from students who said, “It only works if you go through a consultancy.”
But despite her effort, nothing really changed. The rot wasn’t just on the surface, it was built into how the noc nepal system ran day to day.
Then Came the Committee
It wasn’t until Raghujī Pant took office that a formal investigation finally began. A five-member probe committee, led by Krishna Prasad Kapri, was deployed. They walked into the noc office unannounced and began a full-scale internal review.
This time, the action was more concrete:
- A number of NOC office employees were suspended from duty pending investigation
- Access to internal systems was restricted for suspected staff
- Interactions with consultancies were being traced and reviewed
For once, it felt like more than just a PR move.
But as with every high-profile investigation in Nepal, skepticism remains.
Will this actually lead to arrests? Will consultancies face consequences? Will digital loopholes in the noc online system finally be fixed?
That’s the question everyone’s asking, especially the students who did everything by the book and still got left behind.
It’s not the first time the NOC office was cleaned out. But if no one is held accountable, it won’t be the last.
What the Law Says, And How It’s Being Ignored
Let’s be clear about what’s happening here.
Students are getting NOCs without meeting the eligibility criteria.
Consultancies are editing documents, sometimes outright forging them, and submitting them through the noc online system.
Inside the noc office, some staff are approving these applications without asking questions, or because someone else “handled it.”
Payments are being made, not as official processing fees, but as backdoor deals; mostly digital, almost always off-record.
This isn’t just a procedural mess. It’s a full-blown legal violation.
So, what does the law actually say?
1. Prevention of Corruption Act, 2059 (2002)
Nepal’s anti-corruption law spells it out plainly:
- Section 3(1): Any public official who accepts a bribe; whether directly or through someone else, is committing a criminal offense. This applies to NOC staff who process approvals in exchange for money, favors, or pressure from third parties.
- Section 4: Anyone helping facilitate the bribe, like a consultancy, canteen operator, or stationery shop owner, is equally liable under the law.
- Section 17: Public servants who knowingly do something they’re not supposed to (or fail to do something they are required to) can be prosecuted. That includes approving incomplete or fake applications or allowing unauthorized people to access the system.
Penalty: Up to 7 years in jail and a fine equal to the bribe amount, possibly more if it’s proven to be an organized racket.
2. National Penal (Criminal) Code, 2074 (2017)
This law focuses on forgery and misuse of documents, and it hits at the heart of what’s been happening in the noc nepal process.
- Section 276: Forging any document to deceive a government office is a criminal offense. This covers fake offer letters, forged academic records, and altered course details.
- Section 277: Even if you didn’t create the fake document but used it, you’re still liable. That means both students and consultancies can be charged.
Penalty: Up to 5 years of imprisonment and additional fines, depending on the severity of the offense.
Every layer of this scandal violates these laws
At this point, it’s not just about “mismanagement.” It’s criminal misconduct on multiple fronts.
And yet, despite the clarity of the law, enforcement has been minimal. Most offenders; whether inside or outside the noc office, continue to operate under the radar, protected by silence, connections, or simple inaction.
The law is clear.
The violations are obvious.
The question is: will accountability ever follow?
What Should Happen Next
So what now?
Another committee has been formed. A few staff have been suspended. Some doors have been knocked on, again.
But if this cycle is going to end, it can’t stop at warnings and walkouts. The NOC system needs more than cleanup. It needs a reset.
Here’s what should happen next, both inside the ministry and outside it.
A. For the Ministry of Education:
- Lock the Login System
No more shared credentials, no more approvals through borrowed accounts. Every login to the NOC online system should be traceable and secure, with two-factor verification. - Audit the “Helpers”
Strict oversight of consultancies, stationery shops, and any third parties claiming to “assist” with NOC applications. Any entity involved in document prep should be registered, licensed, and transparent. - Student Transparency Dashboard
A live status tracker for students to see where their application is stuck, not just “pending” but who’s handling it and why. No more black box approvals. - Whistleblower Protection
Encourage students and staff to speak up without fear. Right now, the ones doing the right thing are the ones most at risk.
B. For Students: What You Can Do
The sad truth? Many students had no idea their documents were being tampered with. Some trusted consultancies blindly. Others thought paying extra was just “how it works.”
Here’s how you can protect yourself:
- Ask for Copies of Everything You Submit
Always keep a full record of offer letters, transcripts, and application forms. Check that what’s submitted matches what you approved. - Review the Final Uploads Together
Don’t let a consultancy “handle it” entirely on their own. Sit with them when they upload your documents to the NOC online portal. - Say No to Fast-Tracking Without Proof
If someone says, “We can get it done faster,” ask how, and ask for it in writing. If they can’t explain it clearly, it probably isn’t clean. - Use Reputable, Registered Consultants Only
Check for licenses. Ask questions. Read reviews. Not all consultancies are corrupt, but the shady ones count on your silence. - Report Suspicious Behavior
If someone fakes your documents, that’s a crime, and you shouldn’t be the one to suffer for it. Contact the Ministry of Education or media platforms willing to listen.
Fixing the NOC nepal process isn’t just about punishing a few bad actors. It’s about rebuilding trust, so that honest students aren’t left behind, and the rules finally apply to everyone.
Final Thoughts
For thousands of students in Nepal, getting an NOC isn’t just about paperwork, it’s about possibility. The NOC office is supposed to be a gateway to global education, but for many, it feels more like a wall.
The NOC nepal process was meant to be simple: apply NOC online, submit your documents, get approved, and move on with your plans. But somewhere along the way, shortcuts replaced standards. Students with all the right qualifications got stuck. Others with fake papers and fixer connections moved ahead without a hitch.
And in the middle of all this? Real young people; anxious, hopeful, desperate to move forward, caught in a system that made them feel like honesty was the slow lane.
Even now, with committees formed and employees suspended, one question lingers: can this be fixed? Can the NOC online system actually work for those who follow the rules? Or will it keep rewarding those who don’t?
Because this was never just about a single certificate. It was about direction. And if the system that’s supposed to guide students abroad is broken, what does that say about where we’re all heading?